There will be investigation undoubtedly. So who's got more skin in the game? Is it Robinhood with an official press release stating their decision didn't come

There will be investigation undoubtedly. So who's got more skin in the game? Is it Robinhood with an official press release stating their decision didn't come from their market-maker, Citadel, and if this isn't true would face repercussions in court? Or is it Justin, who like the rest of twitter-verse, if wrong, faces zero repercussions?