> Goliath is made of pension funds money Well let's assume that's true (it's not). The logical implication would be that Plotkin is shorting video game develo

> Goliath is made of pension funds money Well let's assume that's true (it's not). The logical implication would be that Plotkin is shorting video game developers and retailers with pensioners' money. The only practical way for market forces to disincentivize that kind of irresponsible and unsuitable risk-taking would be for him to publicly suffer losses. If that happens, the pension funds withdraw their money. If they withdraw their money, Plotkin's take-home pay and social status diminish. So as they say, all roads lead to Rome. No matter where his trading assets came from, he suffers personal financial consequences from the loss and the resulting fallout.