Interesting. You think that my criticism of BLM and antifa is about peaceful protests. Or that sometimes protests become violent and thats acceptable? Ah ok. So

Interesting. You think that my criticism of BLM and antifa is about peaceful protests. Or that sometimes protests become violent and thats acceptable? Ah ok. So them also looting random business and demanding people handing over houses is fine because... 100s of years of racism? I see. I'm trying to understand the situation of a vietamese family running a grocery store that is hit by BLM rioters who begin looting the contents thereof. But its "ok". Its just payback for 100s of years of racism. I'm sure those vietnamese understand that their little store needs to be punished. Its all "fine". As they lose their livelihood. Wrong. Its nothing to do with anything righteous. Its just thugs running wild causing mischief and creating more injustice. I've got nothing against protests against racism. You seem to be conflating the right to protest with the "right" to riot and cause pointless damage and random violence. We should definitely be condemning any BLM members using violence to rob stores and beat up random people. Otherwise you lose any shred of moral decency. You become part of the problem. But mine is an unpopular opinion apparently. Not allowed to criticise BLM or Antifa because their violence is somehow righteous. Just make sure you're not in their way. Even if you support them. They are happy to punch you in the face either way.