3 ms·
Then maybe those folks should get a better feature for that, too. More than one thing can be suboptimal about the same feature-as-implemented.
by TheRealPomax 6y ago
Then maybe those folks should get a better feature for that, too. More than one thing can be suboptimal about the same feature-as-implemented.
- filmgirlcw 6y agoTotally valid, and I'm not opposed to an option to turn it off, I was just saying I can understand why some people might need to keep it on, even if they do have a README and PR template that makes it clear they don't accept PRs. I just think the "crushing the hopes of people that don't read" aspect is probably the lowest priority in that sort of situation.
- cutemonster 6y agoThat's not the only thing. A few of those who didn't read the README, and get their PRs auto closed, might get upset at the maintainers, and write something a bit angry, making it less pleasant to be a maintainer.