4 ms·
So I grew up in a traditional muslim household, here's my understanding of things as they've been taught to me. generally there are 2 types of loans, 1. Kharz
by fzil 6y ago
So I grew up in a traditional muslim household, here's my understanding of things as they've been taught to me.
generally there are 2 types of loans,
1. Kharz Hasan (Loan of goodwill) given out to people/institutions without any collateral, sometimes even without a term limit. Its up to lender to decide if they want their money back or forgive the loan which then turns this loan into a "Sadqah" (charity).
2. Loan with a collateral: this is the standard loan where the two parties agree on a collateral and lend money based on that.
Neither of these above loans involve any kind of interest.
(My) Islamic Understanding of Mortgages:
The risk profile is different compared to normal. Normally what happens is that institutions loan the amount of money and you buy the property and pay interest on the money. In the Muslim Model, the institutions BUY the property and you pay money. The money you pay goes partly towards buying the property and the partly towards paying "fees" to use the property that you don't completely own.
You can see why people would say things like, "oh, they are skirting the rules by changing the name from interest to fees". However, a "proper" implementation would put more burden on the banks in case of a crash.
Hope that clears up few things.
- gher-shyu3i 6y ago> In the Muslim Model, the institutions BUY the property and you pay money. The money you pay goes partly towards buying the property and the partly towards paying "fees" to use the property that you don't completely own. Check out what the Companions Ibn Abbas and Ibn Mas'oud said about such a transaction. It's still Riba (usurious) because the price of the house or asset is raised in exchange for postponing payment. It's only relatively recently with the heavy influence of Western banks that this "model" has gained some traction, but it remains a usurious transaction and many scholars have spoken against it.