> you end up having freedom of press only for the people who own one. That's how things have traditionally been in the US, is it not? As far as I know there wa

> you end up having freedom of press only for the people who own one. That's how things have traditionally been in the US, is it not? As far as I know there was never any law that would force me to allow someone else to use my (literal) printing press. The exception is the FCC fairness doctrine, but the basis for that was that the "printing press" (RF allocations) is actually a common good, and was only granted to private interests in exchange for certain concessions.