4 ms·

It's not only that - the current price of AMC, GME, etc... are being manipulated artificially. This is text-book illegal activity. There is no logical derivat

It's not only that - the current price of AMC, GME, etc... are being manipulated artificially. This is text-book illegal activity. There is no logical derivation of GameStop's financial books that would warrant the kind of stock price it has. It is very very clearly market manipulation, and these exact sorts of manipulations are commonly prosecuted.

virmundi 6y ago
The price of GME is due to a squeeze. The shorts have to get out. People know this. They are refusing to sell. Manipulation but legal.
hyko 6y ago
There’s nothing illegal about buying a stock, or even voicing your opinion about a stock. If only value investing was legal, the stock market look and operate very differently to today. Edited to add: ultimately the law should be there to prevent fraud, not to restrict capital ownership and financial autonomy to a handful of cronies. You know, what they call a free market. Incidentally, if this had been a properly regulated market to begin with, the price inflation would not have been possible.
unityByFreedom 6y ago
If you're able to rally people on social media is that manipulation? I'm not so sure. I think it's very risky for the investors but I don't know whether the SEC has stuff that would cover this. And even if there were a law, if you somehow have your thumb on the social media hype button then how would you enforce that law? Makes me think nothing unruly is going on, just a bubble that will inevitably collapse and make Musk etc. rich once more just like during the dot com era. Some people only know how to make money through theft and I'm not surprised we've found ourselves here after the last 4 years.
- adkadskhj 6y ago
  Yea - i'm confused on what the definition of manipulation is here. If i tell you GME has a new product line that will increase their wealth 10x - that seems like manipulation. If i say to you i'm buying GME and you should too, with clear disclaimers that this isn't financial advice but rather a meme - i don't think i manipulated you. By "normal" definition manipulation requires some about of deception/etc. I don't think "anyone" (within obvious reason) is being manipulated here. It's very clear what the community is buying into. So i come back to what "manipulation" is defined as in the stock sense. Is it meaningfully different?
roel_v 6y ago
"This is text-book illegal activity." Is it? If I have the money to put a short squeeze on someone by myself, with my own money, is that illegal? Isn't that what some people do all the time with smaller numbers? (honestly asking)
- koheripbal 6y ago
  Coordinating millions of people to pump a stock so that a short squeeze will occur is very different from you doing it on your own. Pump and Dump schemes have been illegal forever. This is no different.
  - roel_v 6y ago
    This is not a pump and dump. In PnD, there is an element of subterfuge - the people you are selling to are unaware of what is going on. In this play, all actors are fully informed of what is going on. I mean, maybe some people don't really understand the details, but the majority of people here aren't buying GME because they think it'll keep going up; they all know it's overvalued, but they don't care, because the goal is only partially to make a profit. 'Pump and dump' isn't illegal per se, what is illegal is lying about fundamentals or circumstances to influence stock price. That is not what is happening here. Furthermore, if you're arguing that it's illegal because it's done in group, then I don't understand what legal basis you are using for that. I also don't understand why you'd say it's "very different" from doing it on your own. I can't think of anything else off the top of my head that legal to do on your own, but illegal in group (some things are more illegal in a group, but that's not what we're talking about)
Seanambers 6y ago
No this is EMH at work. Main street has realized that they can attack short positions which are unnatural in size. And they intend to get paid for doing it. Hedge funds are so used to being the only tool on the block, they overextended, and for the first(?) time the retail side is fighting back. The professional investing world have so many advantages over main street that it's not even funny. They've got everything from frontrunning, colocation, free money, and leverage(10x), 'unsophisticated' investors only can dream of this. And when they do go belly up, tax payers bail them out, meanwhile the bonus machine keeps churning. But it is funny and good when main street actually catches them with their hand in the cookie jar. How is this different from Bill Ackmans attack on Herbal life? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQc6L4ieMwo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQc6L4ieMwo How is this different from all the FUD Tesla has gotten over the years? Which CNBC has happily broadcast for years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-YgFDAroeI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-YgFDAroeI
- koheripbal 6y ago
  > How is this different from Bill Ackmans attack on Herbal life? That was shorting. That is LEGAL. > How is this different from all the FUD Tesla has gotten over the years? Tesla was specifically investigated by the SEC when it tried to push short sellers out - and they paid an undisclosed fine for that ILLEGAL activity.
Macha 6y ago
> There is no logical derivation of GameStop's financial books that would warrant the kind of stock price it has. Is there a requirement for stock prices to be logical? Wouldn't that would ban all sorts of hft trades?
themaninthedark 6y ago
Coordinating a short position and shorting over 150% of the available stock is not market and price manipulation?
BunsanSpace 6y ago
What about Tesla? It's incredibly overvalued and in the same boat essentially. Why is one okay but not the other? Right because rich people with connections are the ones being burnt right now.

virmundi 6y ago

The price of GME is due to a squeeze. The shorts have to get out. People know this. They are refusing to sell. Manipulation but legal.

hyko 6y ago

There’s nothing illegal about buying a stock, or even voicing your opinion about a stock. If only value investing was legal, the stock market look and operate very differently to today. Edited to add: ultimately the law should be there to prevent fraud, not to restrict capital ownership and financial autonomy to a handful of cronies. You know, what they call a free market. Incidentally, if this had been a properly regulated market to begin with, the price inflation would not have been possible.

unityByFreedom 6y ago

If you're able to rally people on social media is that manipulation? I'm not so sure. I think it's very risky for the investors but I don't know whether the SEC has stuff that would cover this. And even if there were a law, if you somehow have your thumb on the social media hype button then how would you enforce that law? Makes me think nothing unruly is going on, just a bubble that will inevitably collapse and make Musk etc. rich once more just like during the dot com era. Some people only know how to make money through theft and I'm not surprised we've found ourselves here after the last 4 years.

adkadskhj 6y ago
Yea - i'm confused on what the definition of manipulation is here. If i tell you GME has a new product line that will increase their wealth 10x - that seems like manipulation. If i say to you i'm buying GME and you should too, with clear disclaimers that this isn't financial advice but rather a meme - i don't think i manipulated you. By "normal" definition manipulation requires some about of deception/etc. I don't think "anyone" (within obvious reason) is being manipulated here. It's very clear what the community is buying into. So i come back to what "manipulation" is defined as in the stock sense. Is it meaningfully different?

roel_v 6y ago

"This is text-book illegal activity." Is it? If I have the money to put a short squeeze on someone by myself, with my own money, is that illegal? Isn't that what some people do all the time with smaller numbers? (honestly asking)

koheripbal 6y ago
Coordinating millions of people to pump a stock so that a short squeeze will occur is very different from you doing it on your own. Pump and Dump schemes have been illegal forever. This is no different.
- roel_v 6y ago
  This is not a pump and dump. In PnD, there is an element of subterfuge - the people you are selling to are unaware of what is going on. In this play, all actors are fully informed of what is going on. I mean, maybe some people don't really understand the details, but the majority of people here aren't buying GME because they think it'll keep going up; they all know it's overvalued, but they don't care, because the goal is only partially to make a profit. 'Pump and dump' isn't illegal per se, what is illegal is lying about fundamentals or circumstances to influence stock price. That is not what is happening here. Furthermore, if you're arguing that it's illegal because it's done in group, then I don't understand what legal basis you are using for that. I also don't understand why you'd say it's "very different" from doing it on your own. I can't think of anything else off the top of my head that legal to do on your own, but illegal in group (some things are more illegal in a group, but that's not what we're talking about)

Seanambers 6y ago

No this is EMH at work. Main street has realized that they can attack short positions which are unnatural in size. And they intend to get paid for doing it. Hedge funds are so used to being the only tool on the block, they overextended, and for the first(?) time the retail side is fighting back. The professional investing world have so many advantages over main street that it's not even funny. They've got everything from frontrunning, colocation, free money, and leverage(10x), 'unsophisticated' investors only can dream of this. And when they do go belly up, tax payers bail them out, meanwhile the bonus machine keeps churning. But it is funny and good when main street actually catches them with their hand in the cookie jar. How is this different from Bill Ackmans attack on Herbal life? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQc6L4ieMwo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQc6L4ieMwo How is this different from all the FUD Tesla has gotten over the years? Which CNBC has happily broadcast for years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-YgFDAroeI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-YgFDAroeI

koheripbal 6y ago
> How is this different from Bill Ackmans attack on Herbal life? That was shorting. That is LEGAL. > How is this different from all the FUD Tesla has gotten over the years? Tesla was specifically investigated by the SEC when it tried to push short sellers out - and they paid an undisclosed fine for that ILLEGAL activity.

Macha 6y ago

> There is no logical derivation of GameStop's financial books that would warrant the kind of stock price it has. Is there a requirement for stock prices to be logical? Wouldn't that would ban all sorts of hft trades?

themaninthedark 6y ago

Coordinating a short position and shorting over 150% of the available stock is not market and price manipulation?

BunsanSpace 6y ago

What about Tesla? It's incredibly overvalued and in the same boat essentially. Why is one okay but not the other? Right because rich people with connections are the ones being burnt right now.