3 ms·
This website also contains climate change denial and scare quotes around the word scientist. We should be more skeptical of sites like this.
by JohnHaugeland 6y ago
This website also contains climate change denial and scare quotes around the word scientist.
We should be more skeptical of sites like this.
- pcf 6y agoThis is whataboutism and trying to discredit the researcher. Either analyse and critique the very concrete work displayed here, or don't say anything at all.
- cecja 6y agoWhat research? He cherry picks one popular channel on youtube which gets dislike bombed and presents it as a conspiracy. You are spreading FUD this is no research this is just pseudo science with an agenda.
- teh_klev 6y agoExamples?
- grive 6y agohttps://phzoe.com/2020/03/04/dumbest-math-theory-ever/ https://phzoe.com/2020/03/04/dumbest-math-theory-ever/ https://phzoe.com/2020/10/05/geothermal-to-the-moon/ https://phzoe.com/2020/10/05/geothermal-to-the-moon/ https://phzoe.com/2020/02/20/two-theories-one-ideological-other-verified/ https://phzoe.com/2020/02/20/two-theories-one-ideological-ot... There are may others. It's all over the place. The author denies the Stefan–Boltzmann law that contradicts her model meant to prove most heating is due to geothermal. She also does not believe in Fusion within the Sun, or that photon are particles (only waves, which is linked to the thermal radiation denial). Additionally, the author mocks and attacks anyone contradicting her in the comments. Her argumentation revolves around throwing new theories after new theories that could help explain her impossible results, expecting others to provide the contradiction. All-around extremely exhausting to argue with, bad faith, aggressive and ideologically driven. Amidst all this, many election fraud allegations on the blog, beyond the subtext implying manipulation in this post article.
- teh_klev 6y agoThanks and fair enough.
- akhilcacharya 6y agoThe person also thinks the GA runoffs were fraudulent, for the record.