4 ms·
That's what I use. I thought about the method in the article, but it seemed too complicated, and nginx + fcgi is plenty fast for me. Are there any performance
by ramidarigaz 15y ago
That's what I use. I thought about the method in the article, but it seemed too complicated, and nginx + fcgi is plenty fast for me.
Are there any performance benefits to having Apache as well?
- stock_toaster 15y agoPerformance benefits? No, I wouldn't think so. I can think of too many performance downsides to it. The only benefits I can think of offhand would be if you had a requirement for something that Apache specifically provided, or custom modules you needed run. Something like suphp, modsecurity, or shared hosting configuration, etc. All policy type stuff, not performance.
- mfjordvald 15y agoNone at all. It's purely because most people aren't willing to invest the time it would take to not need .htaccess. In fact by not using PHP-FPM you lose out on awesome stuff like the slow log!