Eh, I'm not sure there's clear moral responsibility when talking your own book. However, he does come off as someone who doesn't understand what he's talking a

Eh, I'm not sure there's clear moral responsibility when talking your own book. However, he does come off as someone who doesn't understand what he's talking about: * comparing WSB "research" with proper fundamental analysis * daily position disclosing is unrealistic and unrelated to what's going on * doubling down on the retail vs wall street narrative and talking about the mortgage crisis, when Melvin Capital is a buy-side institution, not a sell-side institution. * generally painting WSB users as "curageous" for expressing their views in a public forums when a. everyone is using aliases and b. WSB is cery similar to one of those pump-and-dump penny stock IRC chats, just at a much larger scale. He might appear to be confident and informed but, for someone who is familiar with the industry, he just comes off as being full of bullshit/having a hidden agenda.