It seems once a platform gets to a certain size, an entitlement to service regardless of whether it's against the terms of service grows. "Retard" is considere

It seems once a platform gets to a certain size, an entitlement to service regardless of whether it's against the terms of service grows. "Retard" is considered a slur by some. It doesn't matter if others don't consider it to be. The one making the judgement is the service provider. Same with Parlour complaining about being kicked off AWS when they violated their terms of service. There's a copy of the letter AWS sent to them that's public [0] " Recently, we’ve seen a steady increase in this violent content on your website, all of which violates our terms. It’s clear that Parler does not have an effective process to comply with the AWS terms of service. {...} You remove some violent content when contacted by us or others, but not always with urgency. Your CEO recently stated publicly that he doesn’t “feel responsible for any of this, and neither should the platform.”" " It's just a desire to have freedom from consequences. If they self hosted in Alabama, I'm sure they would have been fine. [0] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/amazon-parler-aws https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/amazon-p...