3 ms·
Isn't the lesson to take away from this that online mega-communities simply doesn't work after they reach a certain size. Humans aren't wired in a way that allo
by benjaminjosephw 6y ago
Isn't the lesson to take away from this that online mega-communities simply doesn't work after they reach a certain size. Humans aren't wired in a way that allows them to gather in that number and be able to communicate with each other well. The only workable solution is software moderation which can never possess the moral agency required to legitimize tough decisions and make ethical calls.
Rather than one big community, why not a whole tree of sub-communities. With some clever discovery mechanisms to share content and discussions between sub-communities, this would enable both the larger sense of community while allowing individual circles of tighter knit communities to also form. I think this is the basic idea behind federated social media too where the "clever discovery mechanisms" are human curated lists. It's a good pattern that could work in a more centralized model too.
- uzakov 6y ago>Rather than one big community, why not a whole tree of sub-communities Isn't this essentially Reddit?
- beaconstudios 6y agoReddit owns the whole thing and can boot individual communities. I believe they are talking about self owned communities that form a shared meta-community - bottom up, rather than top down, organisation.