3 ms·
Maybe just re-read this paragraph: > First of all, they evaluate the quality of life almost wholly in terms of activity, especially professional activity. Valu
by airstrike 6y ago
Maybe just re-read this paragraph:
> First of all, they evaluate the quality of life almost wholly in terms of activity, especially professional activity. Valuable years for Lee are “active and event-filled” years. Emanuel asserts, “There are not that many people who continue to be active and engaged and actually creative past 75. It’s a very small number.” It is hard to know whether this is true because he doesn’t define “active” or “engaged” or “creative,” but elsewhere in the same interview he is extremely dismissive of anything, including especially “play,” that is not “meaningful work.” He is quite explicit in his scorn for anyone, even well past retirement age, who lives for play rather than work: “But if it’s the main thing in your life? Ummm, that’s not probably a meaningful life.”
- markuse 6y agoDoesn't this just confirm this though: > And truth be told, it seems like Emanuel - who seems to have said some pretty unpleasant things and is the primary target here - was roped in as a way to tarnish Lee's more recent, more relevant, more even-handed comments. Lee never defines active as having to do with professional activity (at least not in what's quoted in the article), that is Emanuel's definition.