4 ms·
Blippr Is Twitter For Micro-Reviews
- markbao 18y agohttp://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1137766258&channel=979539543&lineup=-1 http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1137766258&chan... Damn. Blippr is executed much better, though. Interesting to see where I was last year.
- felipe 18y agoSeriously, how can someone possibly review Children of Men in less than 160 chars???
- unalone 18y agoPretty easily. The idea is to give a feel for what you feel about it and why. 160 characters is easily enough to do that. And you can convey a lot of emotion in the meantime: http://www.blippr.com/movies/5182-Across-the-Universe/blips/15406 http://www.blippr.com/movies/5182-Across-the-Universe/blips/... If I'm looking to see if I'll like a movie or not, a review like that is perfect.
- gaika 18y agohttp://www.blippr.com/movies/861-Children-of-Men http://www.blippr.com/movies/861-Children-of-Men - 59 reviews give pretty good summury of what to expect.
- ivankirigin 18y agoTwitter is twitter for Micro-anything
- unalone 18y agoIt's a decent TechCrunch headline. The idea isn't to be realistic or accurate. It's to portray a startup. And if you take a review site and mix it with Twitter, this is what you would get.
- ivankirigin 18y agoMy point is that you can make a twitter bot to take microreviews for a given topic very easily, and people are already on twitter. e.g. @blippr i find using the hooks in twitter to be the easiest way to produce a 140 character review. Already sufficient network effects FTL
- maryrosecook 18y agoI knocked something up along those iines a few months ago: http://tweviews.com http://tweviews.com
- ivankirigin 18y agoPerfect! Though to be fair, a categorized review site wouldn't need to spend characters on @username and specifying the topic.