2 ms·
> If Mozart could hear in his head how the music ought to go, Leonardo, judging from his sketches, could simply see in his mind’s eye how the machine should wor
by kordlessagain 6y ago
> If Mozart could hear in his head how the music ought to go, Leonardo, judging from his sketches, could simply see in his mind’s eye how the machine should work or the painting should look.
There seems to be some thing that allows creative construction of these things, in mind, as opposed to simple recall of the sounds or images, in mind.
For example, Mozart might have been able to creatively "construct" the sound of his composures in his mind, but just because someone has heard a Mozart composure performed and then can recall it later, in mind, that fact doesn't make them a genius.
It's both creating and hearing/seeing it first that makes it special.
- rawoke083600 6y agoJa that is kinda a cool way to think about it. It's like they had a better ability to "simulate" the model/music/problem in their mind. By "better" one can argue it was faster, more accurate and more detailed.
- kordlessagain 6y agoExcellent point about what is "better". Being faster, more accurate and more detailed is the "map" problem, where efficiency and interestingness intersect. My theory is this is how animals arrive at consciousness.