Disrupt Office with what? A cheaper, but significantly higher margin version of Office that has broader appeal? That's not disruptive. That's a smart busines

Disrupt Office with what? A cheaper, but significantly higher margin version of Office that has broader appeal? That's not disruptive. That's a smart business move. Or is it a free web version of Office that has no current revenue model? Also, what is the trajectory of Office revenue? Is it a growth area or stable? In the case of OSX it is a MUCH lower percentage of revenue as compared to 3 years earlier. Disruption requires the cannibalizing product to impact the bottom line negatively. The iPad has had the complete opposite effect from the first day. If MS shipped a product that on day 1 resulted in higher earnings than Office, that's not disruptive. But I think we can agree to disagree about if the iPad was a bold gutsy move. I think it was a natural progression from the iPhone and cannibalizing a product that couldn't really grow even during the Vista years wasn't really a concern. You think otherwise.