5 ms·
There was a story yesterday (I'm not sure of its validity) that Citadel has paid for advance knowledge for Robin Hood stock transactions, so they are almost cer
by addicted 6y ago
There was a story yesterday (I'm not sure of its validity) that Citadel has paid for advance knowledge for Robin Hood stock transactions, so they are almost certainly making money on this.
And unsurprisingly they've fronted money to at least 1 of the hedge funds on the wrong side of these trades. They're probably making bank. A couple of particular hedge funds will lose money.
But what happens to the people who are carrying GME when this frenzy ends and no one is willing to buy GME at a $24Bn market cap valuation.
They end up being the ones who paid for everyone else to "lose their shirts".
- mason55 6y ago> There was a story yesterday (I'm not sure of its validity) that Citadel has paid for advance knowledge for Robin Hood stock transactions That's a complete distortion of what's actually happening. If this were actually happening and people knew about it there would be absolute outrage. The truth is that Citadel is one of a few firms that pay Robinhood for the option to take the other side of trades. It's pretty innocuous but people get upset about it and turn it into "Citadel get advance knowledge of Robinhood trades". Citadel is in the business of making markets. Instead of taking a position on a stock, they just happily take the other side of most trades. They make their money by offering slightly below the "true" market price and in exchange they provide liquidity to the market so that you can sell your stock pretty much whenever you want. The idea is that most trades are pretty random and for each trade on one side you have a trade on the other side that balances it out and Citadel keeps the difference between the "true" price and what they pay/sell at. The problem is that sometimes lots of stock will be sold for a good reason (imagine someone finds out that there's an accounting fraud at some company). In this case, Citadel loses money because the trades don't balance out and the stock just goes down. From Citadel's perspective, traders on Robinhood are much more likely to be random people with no extra info (retail investors) and so they're willing to pay Robinhood to route the orders to them because it reduces the risk of adverse selection. In exchange, Citadel has to give a price that's at least equal to the best price in the market or else they're not allowed to fulfill the order.
- deeeeplearning 6y ago>That's a complete distortion of what's actually happening. If this were actually happening and people knew about it there would be absolute outrage. The SEC disagrees https://www.cbsnews.com/news/robinhood-sec-fine-65-million/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/robinhood-sec-fine-65-million/ "Federal officials said that between 2015 and 2018 the company only partially explained on its online FAQ page how it makes money, omitting details about its largest revenue source — trades. Robinhood takes a user's stock order and sells it to a larger trading firm that executes the trade, a process known as "payment for order flow," the SEC order states."
- MrMan 6y agoRobin hood is free because their flow goes to third parties like citadel instead of smart order routers at sell side firms. But that is an edge of a less than a second. It is generally good to be able to ascribe an identity to order flow, but retail tends to behave in a predictable way at medium time scales
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 6y ago(Some?) Of the people carrying gme are saying that because >100% of the float on gme is shorted with ~6 days to cover; gme only needs to stay high until the shorters are forced to cover their short by buying at whatever prices they can.