Freedom of Speech in the US is a tenet and a philosophy. What you're referring to is called a constitutional amendment, which also gets pulled under the umbrel

Freedom of Speech in the US is a tenet and a philosophy. What you're referring to is called a constitutional amendment, which also gets pulled under the umbrella term 'Freedom of Speech' because it's a practical implementation of the ideal. This idea that it's defensible to actively work against the ideals of Freedom of Speech because of a constitutional amendment just doesn't fly. It would be akin to me claiming it isn't immoral to cheat on my spouse because there are laws requiring lawyers to avoid breaching the trust of their clients and therefore trust isn't anything people should consider unless they're lawyers.