> Because nobody reads it there That's a problem that would fix itself the moment most useful research was mainly available on such platforms. > more importan

> Because nobody reads it there That's a problem that would fix itself the moment most useful research was mainly available on such platforms. > more importantly, funders don't recognise the work you've done there Once again, that sounds like mostly a problem that would disappear if a large migration to open platforms was to happen. ---- So it seems the main poroblem seems to be that there's no incentive to be among the first to make the move? IIRC it's often the journals that don't want content to be published elsewhere, so I guess just doing both is also not that simple.