3 ms·
Sure. But it really means IKEA is the biggest single owner of forests, apart from the owner who owns 40 times as much as IKEA does.
by dmurray 6y ago
Sure. But it really means IKEA is the biggest single owner of forests, apart from the owner who owns 40 times as much as IKEA does.
- Darmody 6y agoWho owns 40 times more?
- smileybarry 6y agoSure, but including state ownership skews the metrics. Is there any country where the government/state isn't the biggest owner of forests? Applying the same idea to the US puts the US government at the top with 31.1% of forests[1] even though 35.5% is collectively owned by families. [1] https://www.nwtf.org/conservation/article/who-owns-forests-woodlands https://www.nwtf.org/conservation/article/who-owns-forests-w...
- s1artibartfast 6y agoI think it is Relevant precisely because skew the metrics When we talk about land-use.If it is left out people can make all kinds of misinformed Conclusions.