5 ms·
It depends where you are I imagine. Some countries have cultures where any attempts to lessen the messaging in coronavirus news is on par with being morally wro
by thinkingemote 6y ago
It depends where you are I imagine. Some countries have cultures where any attempts to lessen the messaging in coronavirus news is on par with being morally wrong (or even dangerous). Other cultures are more critical or resistant. HN has a very diverse mix of users from a range of places.
- XorNot 6y agoPerspective distortion misuse was neither of these though. It was simply dishonest journalism which distorted the messaging everywhere: are people following lockdowns and distancing or not? How does this relate to case numbers? Who could know because the pictures being put out there meant nothing.
- thinkingemote 6y agoYes we agree with each other.
- gabriel34 6y agoThis may, in fact, backfire in a couple of ways: 1. It may reduce societal pressure to isolate by making it seem only a minority of people are actually doing it (much like the broken windows theory) 2. It fuels distrust in media outlets. Deservingly so, even if machiavellianly this choice seems to serve the greater good.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ghaff 6y ago"Misuse" is something of a judgment call though. Pretty much any photo makes choices of perspective, framing, etc. There are certainly cases of clear distortion but, especially in the context of distancing, arbitrary photos--even with "'normal"-ish focal lengths can tell very different stories depending upon where the camera is pointed.
- t-writescode 6y agoIf you're standing 100 feet away to use a movie-magic trick to make two objects seem next to each other when they're very much not, you're (edit: probably) being dishonest. edit: when that standing next to each other is attempting to introduce a narrative that people are doing something contrary to what they're actually doing