3 ms·
> It's worrying and baffling that someone's source of income can be severed when there has been no evidence of misconduct. You have zero idea what evidence the
by user-the-name 6y ago
> It's worrying and baffling that someone's source of income can be severed when there has been no evidence of misconduct.
You have zero idea what evidence there is and isn't. The evidence has not been revealed by those involved, and it certainly hasn't been published in this short article you just read.
You just assumed that "she used two sites" was the absolute entirety of the story.
- vergessenmir 6y agoThe agency president tweeted in now-deleted tweets that Colleen was fired for using conservative platforms and that they do not condone this activity. Followed by an apology for any offence caused. If there was further evidence she did not feel the need to disclose further. However it does appear that mentioning the association was enough justification. Also the complaints that were aired didn't provide any further evidence other than the fact that she was on the platform. Again only providing the association as the source of the concern. How do we get from that to a very public firing over a space of a few hours? More evidence may come to light but there are several things very problematic about this.
- user-the-name 6y agoThere's a lot hiding in that one word, "using". What exactly were they "used" for?