3 ms·

Did you edit the Wikipedia page or challenge the interpretation in the talk page?

• DarkWiiPlayer 6y ago
  I already spend a lot of time trying to "fix the internet" and just don't have the stamina to also start fixing wikipedia now. I'm also being turned away by the constant stories of edit-wars that tend to happen about certain controversial topics.
• roel_v 6y ago
  Wikipedia itself has descended into the same pathologies you see in 'science' today: a bunch of gatekeepers who, by account of having been there the longest, have set up a moat of rules and 'culture' and such, to the point where newcomers are shut down or drowned out. I'm not saying it's impossible to get in; but only those that sufficiently mould themselves to the existing people and structures will last long enough to become fully accepted. And so the system sustains itself.
  • aspaceman 6y ago
    What are you even talking about? I genuinely have no idea. You mind tangibly identifying how Wikipedia has descended into chaos like you say?
    • MaxBarraclough 6y ago
      They're not the only person to have made an honest effort to improve Wikipedia, only to be met with legalistic hostility and inertia.
• auganov 6y ago
  I wanted to edit an article about an obscure religious group that included some blatantly wrong statements about the espoused ideology. They had an academic tertiary source making these claims extrapolated from reaearch by the same author that made both plausible claims but also included similar inferences. Being a very obscure group there aren't many other academic sources discussing it. All literature that could disprove these claims comes from non-academics affiliated with the group which are a no-go. As per Wikipedia rules (which took hours to figure out), there's not much one can do short of getting some impartial or friendly academic to publish a more reasonable article.