> completely within the bounds of what society considers normal (being gay) Feedback at your request - This rubbed me the wrong way because homosexuality was

> completely within the bounds of what society considers normal (being gay) Feedback at your request - This rubbed me the wrong way because homosexuality was classed as a disorder in my lifetime. (And that has an impact on me, still today - and it is still used as justification for criminalisation in 72 countries). So, there is fair reason to equate them. If we were having this discussion in 1973, would you be saying "it does nobody a service to see homosexuality as normal"? Because a large proportion of psychiatrists and people were saying that. What makes those people (in the past) wrong to say that, while you (in the present) are right to say this?