3 ms·
No, that's totally wrong. The arrest is the entire legal foundation for the constitutional argument because the arresting officers are censoring speech in their
by root_axis 6y ago
No, that's totally wrong. The arrest is the entire legal foundation for the constitutional argument because the arresting officers are censoring speech in their capacity as agents of the state on the basis of legal statute (trespassing laws). Without the arrest there would have been no legal case at all. The 1st amendment restricts the actions of the state not the company town.