3 ms·
> Something that has struck out to me for many years now is the rather striking lack of reporting on the incredibly strong correlation between parental (both ma
by lc9er 6y ago
> Something that has struck out to me for many years now is the rather striking lack of reporting on the incredibly strong correlation between parental (both maternal/paternal) age at time of conception and ASM.
I thought this was common knowledge? I’ve certainly read this frequently and it’s something that is brought up (anecdotally) by OB/GYNs as women enter their 30’s. My wife and several family members ruefully will tell stories about how their doc let them know that they’ll be considered of “advanced maternal age” when they hit 35. They were then reminded of the increased risk of birth defects, autism, and complications.
- TeMPOraL 6y agoPerhaps not common enough. For instance, both my wife and I knew about the ~35 point of "advanced maternal age" and that there are risks associated with late conception, but it's the first time I hear autism is one of these risks.
- jtbayly 6y agoSame here.
- valarauko 6y ago>“advanced maternal age” when they hit 35 I'm old enough (ironically) that I was taught the term as "geriatric pregnancy"