3 ms·
Interesting. I still prefer the clarity of the map of mathematical structures I ran across in the late 90s from Max Tegmark... Perhaps it might interest some o
by gregw2 6y ago
Interesting. I still prefer the clarity of the map of mathematical structures I ran across in the late 90s from Max Tegmark... Perhaps it might interest some of you who are reading this discussion: https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif
(parent webpage if you want more context: https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html).
- slowmovintarget 6y agoAren't those the ones used in physics, not all of the ones there are (even in the 90s)?
- sn41 6y agoThank you for that link. This is really interesting. I am used to thinking in terms of "removing" features in order to get to more abstract notions. But it is good to have most such structures in one map.
- laichzeit0 6y ago> https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif I really like this map. Do you know of a similar map for statistics?
- taliesinb 6y agoYou might like https://twitter.com/xbresson/status/1271124929505714176?s=12 https://twitter.com/xbresson/status/1271124929505714176?s=12
- mvanaltvorst 6y agoI prefer this one: http://www.math.wm.edu/~leemis/chart/UDR/UDR.html http://www.math.wm.edu/~leemis/chart/UDR/UDR.html