3 ms·
This is because we originally thought "only a human would be able to play chess", "only a human would be able to drive a car". The thinking there is that if we
by Jasper_ 6y ago
This is because we originally thought "only a human would be able to play chess", "only a human would be able to drive a car". The thinking there is that if we were to solve these problems, we'd have to get closer to a true artificial intelligence (the kind that today we'd call "AGI" because "AI" doesn't mean anything anymore).
This line of thinking has been shown to be pretty faulty. We've come up with engines and algorithms that can play Go and Chess, but we aren't any closer to anything that resembles a general intelligence.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- sdenton4 6y agoWell, GPT3 is definitely not a general intelligence, but I would say it's much closer than deep blue. Progress is happening! It's just a question of how far and fast we run with the goalposts.