3 ms·
An election theft is conspiracy by definition. The question is whether the conspiracy is feasible. But it is feasible if only a few counties or cities committ
by yters 6y ago
An election theft is conspiracy by definition. The question is whether the conspiracy is feasible. But it is feasible if only a few counties or cities committed fraud. What makes conspiracy infeasible is widespread collusion without a mechanism of coordination and ensuring secrecy. Collusion in a few large municipalities does not seem obviously out of the question.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> An election theft is conspiracy by definition. No, its not. Either a single actor with appropriate access or multiple independent actors not acting in coordination could effect the theft of an election without any conspiracy. Conspiracy requires an agreement to work together; that might help with an election theft but it is not “by definition” necessary for election theft.
- yters 6y agoMultiple conspiracies of one?