8 ms·
We're not talking about murder. We're talking about a different kind of crime. The law states someone has to 'knowingly try to interfere etc' but the challeng
by jariel 6y ago
We're not talking about murder.
We're talking about a different kind of crime.
The law states someone has to 'knowingly try to interfere etc' but the challenge is that you'd have to prove that Trump knew he lost.
If he truly believed he had won, well, then he'd just be trying to fix the election, not rig it, right?
The call was along the lines of how Mafia bosses talk, so that they don't implicate themselves.
Here are some details [1]
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-s-call-georgia-s-raffensperger-could-be-criminal-it-n1252761 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-s-call-g...
I think they ought to adjust the laws here. Elected officials should maybe be able to provide evidence for review, but that's it.
- tshaddox 6y ago> The law states someone has to 'knowingly try to interfere etc' but the challenge is that you'd have to prove that Trump knew he lost. But surely he was knowingly try to interfere even if he had in fact won.