3 ms·
Firefox. But kidding aside, for what I've found on adblocks for Safari you need to pay and I believe those are quite inferior in blockage to uBlock.
by hetspookjee 6y ago
Firefox. But kidding aside, for what I've found on adblocks for Safari you need to pay and I believe those are quite inferior in blockage to uBlock.
- S_A_P 6y agoHave to agree here. I actually quite like safari, but cant use it due to no uBlock Origin which is unfortunate. uBlock and Facebook Container have made all the difference for me.
- jws 6y agoIf you are in the "I wish Safari blocked ads" boat but don't know where to go, let me recommend an out… There are a lot of reasonable choices, I've been using Wipr for years. It does a good job of blocking ads and costs about $2. There are macOS and iOS versions, they update their lists, and because of the architecture have no access to your browsing so can never be tempted to start farming you. (No affiliation, I haven't done an extensive comparison, but this one works and isn't expensive and you can stop worrying about what to do if you do this now.)
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]