3 ms·
> and any solution that tries to deal with those just ends up being equivalent to what already exists: Delete and repost. I'd love this honestly. Even if it wa
by corobo 6y ago
> and any solution that tries to deal with those just ends up being equivalent to what already exists: Delete and repost.
I'd love this honestly. Even if it was just a delete and repost under the hood, generally I find I want an edit button just after posting and noticing all the typos.
As long as the interface interacted like an edit form rather than have me copy and then rebuild the tweet I'd be good to go.
- skinkestek 6y agoMastodon has this :-)
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- thebean11 6y agoIt would be bad UX. Users would expect it to edit (keeping likes, retweets, replies, timestamp etc) but it would actually delete and repost which is a very different thing on Twitter.
- corobo 6y agoThat would by why I included my use case. Limit it to the first 2 minutes or whatever. Users would get used to it within days either way.
- user-the-name 6y agoMastodon has a "Delete and repost", which deletes the post, and copies the contents to the posting field so you can edit and repost.
- corobo 6y agoTwitter has users, can't beat that feature. I'll use Mastodon when it's worth the server admin haha
- user-the-name 6y agoBit angry, are we.
- corobo 6y agoAngry at what?