4 ms·

Will switch to firefox because of this, absolutely disgusting.

• jefftk 6y ago
  Safari, Chrome, and Edge already partitioned the HTTP Cache by site; Firefox was the last major browser not to. It's great that Firefox is doing this, but it's not a differentiator.
  • viseztrance 6y ago
    The way they phrased it, in the post implies otherwise? > These impacts are similar to those reported by the Chrome team for similar cache protections they are planning to roll out.
    • jefftk 6y ago
      See https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2020/10/http-cache-partitioning#is_it_already_enabled_on_my_chrome_how_can_i_check https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2020/10/http-cache... "The feature is being rolled out through late 2020. To check whether your Chrome instance already supports it: ..."
    • madeofpalk 6y ago
      It’s listed on Safari’s site https://webkit.org/tracking-prevention/#partitioned-third-party-http-cache https://webkit.org/tracking-prevention/#partitioned-third-pa... Safari has been doing this since 2013 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110269 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110269 Tweeted about in 2017 https://twitter.com/cramforce/status/849621456111624192 https://twitter.com/cramforce/status/849621456111624192
• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]