96 ms·
'Renaissance' implies a first version, was there any attempt to add typing in older versions of python that were dropped ? As a side note, for a related projec
by Majestic121 6y ago
'Renaissance' implies a first version, was there any attempt to add typing in older versions of python that were dropped ?
As a side note, for a related project linked to typinglike the TypedDict, I found that Pydantic is pretty amazing.
- davidfstr 6y ago> was there any attempt to add typing in older versions of python that were dropped ? Not that I know of. I used "renaissance" to connote an increased positive focus, invigoration, and activity.
- guywhocodes 6y agoIt makes sense if see it as Renaissance for Python, driven by type checking. Or at least the most sense I can find. For me this is true, I've come back to Python because of it for personal projects. I'm still trying to cargo cult myself into thinking that Python async makes any sense however. Why not just go with a genserver abstraction and expose the primitives over this mess we have?
- soledades 6y agoI think the way to parse it is as "a renaissance of type checking, in python," i.e. in the same sense that "The Renaissance" was "a renaissance of classical culture, in Italy."
- 4gotunameagain 6y agoOne could argue that the first version is Archaic, and Renaissance the second attempt