And while it may seem crass and anti-intellectual to consider a financial measure of success Why are other metrics Norvig provides like articles published or p

And while it may seem crass and anti-intellectual to consider a financial measure of success Why are other metrics Norvig provides like articles published or prevalence in practical applications are considered more intellectual? And besides, I don't think "accurately modeling the world" is the end of it. Classical Newtonian mechanics correctly describe 99% of our activities in the real world and were considered pinnacle of scientific achievement for several centuries. Yet we know today that they're just a subset of General relativity and Quantum mechanics.