3 ms·
> It should be required by law that there be a simple to access “opt out to everything” option that should be as easy to access as an “opt in to everything” opt
by poizan42 6y ago
> It should be required by law that there be a simple to access “opt out to everything” option that should be as easy to access as an “opt in to everything” option.
It arguably is already required with the language of article 7.2 and recital 32, especially this part
> If the data subject’s consent is to be given following a request by electronic means, the request must be clear, concise and not unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided.
But we will see how it gets interpreted as more cases works their way through the system.
- Blikkentrekker 6y agoYes, that is very arguable. The phrasing “The-opt-out-to-everything option must be as easily accessible as the opt-in-to-everything option.” is far less arguable and hiding one behind a further menu, but one not, is a clear violation of this rule.