2 ms·
The OP, Zack Weinberg helpfully published his analysis on his own web page¹ and the formatting (different typeface for headings, flowing paragraph text, hyperte
by Anthony-G 6y ago
The OP, Zack Weinberg helpfully published his analysis on his own web page¹ and the formatting (different typeface for headings, flowing paragraph text, hypertext links, bullet points) made the analysis much more readable.
I think email is fine as the communication medium for software projects – particularly for projects that have been around for as long as Autotools†. For me, the biggest downside is that not all mailing lists use GNU mailman or other listserv software that provide archiving of list posts. Having a searchable archive of discussions is invaluable.
† though I was surprised to see a number of contributors top-posting; that practice was universally discouraged on Internet mailing lists until the number of new members using MS Outlook overwhelmed members who followed the established “netiquette”
1. https://www.owlfolio.org/development/autoconf-swot/ https://www.owlfolio.org/development/autoconf-swot/
- mangecoeur 6y agoSo we agree that the online presentation is not good - I have no issue with email particularly, i have a problem with the email archives. More specifically, the fact that no one cares about the usability of the archive or online presentation is proof that they don't care about the impression they make external people. They can hardly complain about the lack of new contributors if they make no effort to be accessible to them.