3 ms·
Here's a more realistic guide with none of the hippie seasteading false optimism: Step 1) Acquire a large standing army, logistics, and lots of rockets and big
by ampdepolymerase 6y ago
Here's a more realistic guide with none of the hippie seasteading false optimism:
Step 1) Acquire a large standing army, logistics, and lots of rockets and big radars (the bigger the better, stealth planes are very tricky to detect without massive antennas).
Step 2) Nuclear weapons, ICBMs, and stealthy submarines.
Step 3) Sufficient infrastructure to support autarchy and the above two steps.
In the current age, without the patronage of a larger state, starting a country ex nihilo with the expectation that it will remain sovereign is not possible (surprisingly you don't hear from Thiel's pet think tanks about the sovereignty problem when it comes to building a country in the middle of the sea, you would think the founder of Palantir should have some creative solutions).
Modern assymetric war doctrine relies on air superiority. Deny other countries the skies and you will be free. You don't really need a conventional navy if you don't plan to project force. Countries like Iran use a large fleet of small boats armed with rockets to counter bigger navies (and more importantly, carriers. Their boat swarm strategy however is untested outside of simulations). A country is built on legitimate violence. At the end of the day, the nuclear triad is the only and ultimate guarantee of true territorial sovereignty. Legitimacy will come naturally when sovereignty becomes absolute.
Sovereignty in political science and international relations lie on a spectrum. Countries like Cuba have quite limited sovereignty[0]. A fully nuclear armed seasteading state may never achieve economic sovereignty due to sanctions by incumbents, but it will definitely have full perpetual control of its territories and in the current multipolar world, there are plenty of opportunities to increase economic sovereignty.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/cuba-the-u-s-and-the-concept-of-sovereignty-toward-a-common-vocabulary/ https://www.brookings.edu/research/cuba-the-u-s-and-the-conc...
- aaron695 6y ago> Acquire a large standing army, Why not get the coronavirus and run it through easy to get mammals like abandoned cats until it's really dangerous. Or buy a plot near a bat cave and collect different viruses from local bats. Why are bio-weapons not nuclear equivalent? Basically Raven from Snow Crash but with a wider game theory model.
- nine_k 6y agoBio weapons can be devastating, but, unlike nuclear warheads, they are very hard to target.
- cultofmetatron 6y agocripr tech is so cheap I could setup an entire lab for a minuscule fraction of the price of the raw materials for a nuke. I'd argue that the bar for research and development of bio weapons are much lower. The problem is the area of affect which potentially goes much farther than a nuke.
- guerrilla 6y agoThat really depends on the goals. If they don't have any resources anyone wants and aren't going to do anything that upsets any other country then all of that is not really necessary/.
- wodenokoto 6y agoSouth Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011. To my knowledge they don't have nuclear weapons or big raders that can detect stealth planes. Their Airforce consist of less than 20 aircraft. I don't know if you consider that air superiority. You are spot on about having a large standing army. According to wikipedia they have 1850.000 enlisted!
- RegnisGnaw 6y ago"In the current age, without the patronage of a larger state"
- abdullahkhalids 6y agoThe Seasteading Institute does attempt to do legal research on creating countries [1]. I am not a lawyer, so I can't comment on whether the research is substantial or going anywhere. [1] https://www.seasteading.org/law-and-policy/ https://www.seasteading.org/law-and-policy/