Traditonally the obligation of proof lies on the person making the claim. And likewise, it's near impossible to prove a negative. If we followed your train of

Traditonally the obligation of proof lies on the person making the claim. And likewise, it's near impossible to prove a negative. If we followed your train of thought, we'd be demanding that Hillary Clinton prove she didn't harvest adenochrome from terrified paedophilia victims in a pizza restaurant. Which is pretty ridiculous, right?