3 ms·
Diebold is not a previous version of Dominion. Dominion acquired all of the material assets of Premier, which was a renamed Diebold, from ES&S due to an anti-t
by bena 6y ago
Diebold is not a previous version of Dominion.
Dominion acquired all of the material assets of Premier, which was a renamed Diebold, from ES&S due to an anti-trust lawsuit.
Now, ES&S has issues, but you're not going to hear anything about that. Because ES&S machines are used in places like Kentucky, South Carolina, and Florida.
- yters 6y agoSure, but this exception proves the point. There are indeed electronic voting machines widely considered to be suspect. So the notion that electronic voting machines could potentially be used to commit fraud in this election is not out of the question.
- bena 6y agoYou were specifically trying to cast doubt on Dominion. And now that your statement has been outed as false, you're moving the goalposts to "voting machines in general".
- yters 6y agoNo, Dominion purchased these questionable voting machines, so they clearly possess questionable voting machines. So my major claim that Dominion possesses questionable voting machines is substantiated. In fact ES&S equipment is used by Georgia.
- bena 6y agoDominion won the contract in Georgia. And just because they purchased the assets doesn't mean they just used them without checking them.
- yters 6y agoWell, the question remains then. Definitely they are not beyond question. There is a traceable lineage of questionable machines leading right up to the region where vote fraud allegations through electronic vote machines. Enough that a decent look by a disinterested party is warranted.