3 ms·
Really have to agree with the doubters. I have used Autotools since the nineties and I have never been able to understand it or make use of it for a fresh proj
by worik 6y ago
Really have to agree with the doubters.
I have used Autotools since the nineties and I have never been able to understand it or make use of it for a fresh project (well once, using some gui tool that completely abstracted away the pain, was incompatible with anything else, and who's name escapes me now)
In its day it was a wonder: tar xf; cd ... ; ./configure --prefix=`pwd` ; make ; make test (if you are very lucky) ; make install
But times have changed.
Interfaces are much more standardised now, and from where I sit it is the "polyglot" problem that is interesting, not different architectures.
It is time to pick a winner from all the multitude of tools out there and GNU should go with that....
- enriquto 6y ago> It is time to pick a winner from all the multitude of tools out there and GNU should go with that.... plain Makefiles without configuration that work on linux and macos out of the box. Those are musch easier to write than to setup autotools or write a cmakelists.
- pjmlp 6y agoIf that is your bubble.