3 ms·
This seems overly ambitious, and not likely to translate to laser satellite comms links. Remember these sats are in low LEO, so there is at least some amount o
by snoshy 6y ago
This seems overly ambitious, and not likely to translate to laser satellite comms links. Remember these sats are in low LEO, so there is at least some amount of non-uniform atmospheric medium to create optical distortion that you wouldn't have in a tightly controlled environment from your link (chip, datacenter, what have you).
Then there's the issue of signal attenuation at distances like these, along with the power budget from the solar panels to ensure that you aren't burning all your power just on laser comms.
I can't imagine these links would be anything more than 1:1 at any given time, at least not at first. Maybe later they might be able to handle simultaneous laser links from 1:3 or something like it, but I highly doubt that's their current capability.
Even some of the best latest ground-to-sat laser comms links are on the order of ~7 gigabits per second. [1] I imagine those are far larger sats than Starlink, and their entire power and thermal budget is likely spent on comms. And the ground stations can be orders of magnitude larger and power hungry in relation to a Starlink sat. Note also that this is from GEO, so you aren't likely having to handle substantial relative movement either.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_communication_in_space#2011-present https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_communication_in_space#2...
- BenjiWiebe 6y agoSeems like a LEO-to-LEO laser link would be shorter, lower noise, and lower power for the same bandwidth as a GEO-Earth link.
- lutorm 6y agoSpace to ground is a lot harder than space to space. There is no atmosphere to deal with and in most cases the relative velocity is lower.
- mapt 6y agoThe link between neighboring satellites in a 22-satellite-per-plane constellation at 550km altitude comes at its closest 480km above the ground. The link between next-farthest-neighbors comes at its closest 270km from the ground. The link to the second-farthest-neighbor is not in line of sight. Optical effects at 270km or 480km altitude are negligible; 99% of the atmosphere's mass is below 30km altitude. In theory you could go all the way down to an 8-satellite plane at 550km and still maintain line of sight and freedom from most of the atmosphere's interference. Satellite-to-ground optical laser links are another matter, but you can always route a few hops around weather systems.