It's a neat concept, but I think that 'both sides' doesn't work in a world with nuance, especially in a world where most (social) disputes are moral, teleologic

It's a neat concept, but I think that 'both sides' doesn't work in a world with nuance, especially in a world where most (social) disputes are moral, teleological, or epistemological disagreements masking themselves as disputes of a factual nature. I don't think this format is particularly conducive to achieving persuasion, synthesis, or producing comparisons between equivalent perspectives (some people are just wrong, some peoples precepts are so fundamentally incompatible with each-other's that their perspectives are like apples and oranges).