6 ms·
This then implies that if nothing is moving there is no time. Absolute 0 is timeless. Kinda makes sense.
by ericHosick 15y ago
This then implies that if nothing is moving there is no time. Absolute 0 is timeless. Kinda makes sense.
- VB6_Foreverr 15y agoWhen something is frozen is there still movement at the subatomic level (electrons orbiting etc) or does that cease too?
- david927 15y agoNothing ever stops moving. Ever. To do so would violate the uncertainty principle. So we'll always have time.
- geon 15y ago> To do so would violate the uncertainty principle. Not if we don't know the exact location of the particle, right?
- ars 15y agoBut you always know at least some information about the location. For example you know it's in the visible universe, which puts an upper bound to its location, and therefor it's momentum. But don't forget the Time<-->Energy uncertainty. If you know the energy of a particle very exactly you don't know how time will pass for it.
- weavejester 15y agoBut as the Universe approaches 100% entropy, how would you determine the order of events? The only mechanism we have of determining the arrow of time is by measuring increases in entropy.