Once a proposition is falsified a rational community would rejected it. Once your community or protocol "philosophically" rejects checksums it is only a matter

Once a proposition is falsified a rational community would rejected it. Once your community or protocol "philosophically" rejects checksums it is only a matter of time before your system breaks catastrophically. This philosophical freedom vs authoritarianism thing you're proposing is a view that is incomplete and small to the point of being false. The actual underlying question is do you accept that grounded truth exists and are you willing to have a large and nuanced enough view to include all non false propositions and reject all false propositions.