4 ms·
Could it be because when it comes to nudity, the rules can be clearly defined? "No nipples" is a pretty simple rule that doesn't leave room for interpretation.
by dudul 6y ago
Could it be because when it comes to nudity, the rules can be clearly defined? "No nipples" is a pretty simple rule that doesn't leave room for interpretation.
"No violent rape", "no violent murder" not so much. These are fairly subjective, and even tautological.
Not saying it's not a funny paradox, just trying to figure out why.
- _jal 6y agoNope, that's an unenforceable rule, too. Here's a great article explaining the evolution of FB's nipple policy: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190503/17322942136/content-moderation-scale-is-impossible-facebook-still-cant-figure-out-how-to-deal-with-naked-breasts.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190503/17322942136/conte...
- dudul 6y agoInteresting article, but I don't think that applies to TV media. People don't share their content on TV, it is very easy for TV censors to say "no female nipple on screen, period". For sure this becomes a problem on social media where there are plenty of reasons to share pictures with nudity (arts, breast feeding, etc), but not for movies/tv shows.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Blikkentrekker 6y ago“female nipples” have seen many amusing challenges, such as censoring female nipples by hiding them behind male nipples edited over them.