> How would anyone know they are baseless unless a proper investigation is conducted independently? What about the thousands of sworn affidavits? Surely, ALL of

> How would anyone know they are baseless unless a proper investigation is conducted independently? What about the thousands of sworn affidavits? Surely, ALL of them can't be lying. Proper investigations were conducted, and no serious issues found. The lawsuits were laughed out of court, even by Republican judges. Its surely possible that all those "sworn affidavits" can be wrong in some way: AFAIK, they were either bogus, irrelevant, or from people who didn't understand what they were seeing because they hadn't bothered to familiarize themselves with the vote counting process before they became election observers. The more pertinent question is: how could anyone still believe those lawsuits could have merit at this point? The sad answer is: disinformation works.