4 ms·
Companies? How about your government? I have a coworker who had returns filed against them by someone in prison! If that does not startle people how about that
by Shivetya 6y ago
Companies? How about your government? I have a coworker who had returns filed against them by someone in prison! If that does not startle people how about that in some states absentee votes are merely verified against a signature on file.
What we need is a means that others can be sure it really is us and we can sure that actions we have taken are credited to us and those we did not are not.
In effect we will need a system by which we have instant notification; similar to how some CC providers mail or text you each transaction; and historical tracking so that we can prove when we did or did not.
However there are not many unique methods to physically identify people short of dna transfer. I know that people bring up Minority Report whenever facial recognition comes up but that wasn't the tech they used, they used iris recognition.
So we break down each action and assign a value to how secure and verified it must be and work our way up from there. Similar to how self driving cars are defined, on a level of one to five how secure must an action be before its accepted
- xiphias2 6y agoI don’t see much difference between companies and governments, that’s why having an authentication standard that is accepted by all of them (and users as well) is important.