3 ms·
From my understanding 1) many of those affidavits were just hear say with little corroborating evidence, extreme claims "The US government is fundamentally ille
by wolfram74 6y ago
From my understanding 1) many of those affidavits were just hear say with little corroborating evidence, extreme claims "The US government is fundamentally illegitimate" requires more extreme evidence than "I heard a guy who said they were a poll watch saw things go weird"
2) and other witnesses wildly embellished their credibility, Joshua Merritt, aka "Spider" aka "Spyder" was listed as a military intelligence expert, while what is able to be verified is that he enlisted in the training program but failed to complete the entry level material.
The arguments have been made, the evidence has been examined, to say /no/ investigation has occurred is willfully misinformed at this point.
1)https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/politics/2020/12/04/evidence-hearsay-voter-fraud-claims-in-affidavits-explained/ https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/politics/2020/12/04/evid...
2)https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-spider-spyder-witness/2020/12/11/0cd567e6-3b2a-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-...
- adictator 6y agoIt's quite obvious you have never read even one of those affidavits. Vote for or support whoever you want, but try to side with truth at the very least. The affidavits are very explicit - they directly call out names and roles. They are specific in what was actually witnessed. Go through them if you really care about truth. Otherwise we have nothing to discuss.