4 ms·
It might just be some easy to ignore noise. Worst thing is, unless this is used by a very large chunk of the population, it would even be another tool to ident
by k_ 6y ago
It might just be some easy to ignore noise.
Worst thing is, unless this is used by a very large chunk of the population, it would even be another tool to identify you.
- whiw 6y ago> it would even be another tool to identify you How exactly? It seems like a difficult problem for a website to me.
- k_ 6y agoThey can use "headers include random things" as a filter like they do with other headers presence/absence/value already. I don't think defining "random things" would be too hard for them.
- whiw 6y ago1. Noise that looks like valid signal is the most difficult kind to remove. 2. They would have to track the noise over page requests to know that it was noise. The saving of and correlation of the saved state would be a pain.